<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>d  a  n  i  e  l  k  .  o  r  g &#187; News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danielk.org/blog/category/news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danielk.org/blog</link>
	<description>an eclectic collection of information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 16:50:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why did stackexchange fail?</title>
		<link>http://danielk.org/blog/2010/08/06/why-did-stackexchange-fail/</link>
		<comments>http://danielk.org/blog/2010/08/06/why-did-stackexchange-fail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 19:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Kivatinos</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stackexchange]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielk.org/blog/?p=948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am asking myself this question. Why did stackexchange fail? Over at drchrono.com we were JUST starting to use it. Over time I think stackexchange information silos would have grown. Joel and Jeff and the community really didn&#8217;t give it a chance. It takes over a year for an exchange like that to really become [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdanielk.org%2Fblog%2F2010%2F08%2F06%2Fwhy-did-stackexchange-fail%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdanielk.org%2Fblog%2F2010%2F08%2F06%2Fwhy-did-stackexchange-fail%2F&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>I am asking myself this question.</p>
<p>Why did stackexchange fail? Over at drchrono.com we were JUST starting to use it. Over time I think stackexchange information silos would have grown. Joel and Jeff and the community really didn&#8217;t give it a chance. It takes over a year for an exchange like that to really become significant. Advocates of the stackexchanges needed to be found over time. Rome wasn&#8217;t built in a day.</p>
<p>When I saw that Joel and Jeff were taking down the stack exchange sites it was a sad day. I thought that they were really going to give us tools to expand the web. For drchrono.com we were planning on using the technology to give doctors a place to get questions answered (currentbilling.com). Now we need to look elsewhere for that technology since stackexhange is shutting down.</p>
<p>A great technology that wasn&#8217;t given the time it needed to really expand.</p>
<p>Either way Joel, Jeff and their team are doing a great job, they have built a great technology, so I am rooting for them and where they take it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://danielk.org/blog/2010/08/06/why-did-stackexchange-fail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Timothy Karr on new rules for FCC on Wireless net neutraility</title>
		<link>http://danielk.org/blog/2009/11/20/timothy-karr-on-new-rules-for-fcc-on-wireless-net-neutraility/</link>
		<comments>http://danielk.org/blog/2009/11/20/timothy-karr-on-new-rules-for-fcc-on-wireless-net-neutraility/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Kivatinos</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielk.org/blog/?p=446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdanielk.org%2Fblog%2F2009%2F11%2F20%2Ftimothy-karr-on-new-rules-for-fcc-on-wireless-net-neutraility%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdanielk.org%2Fblog%2F2009%2F11%2F20%2Ftimothy-karr-on-new-rules-for-fcc-on-wireless-net-neutraility%2F&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Bn6JVmmaJss&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Bn6JVmmaJss&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://danielk.org/blog/2009/11/20/timothy-karr-on-new-rules-for-fcc-on-wireless-net-neutraility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
